Monthly Archives: July 2009

Comment policy

I don’t have an official policy. I obviously don’t routinely censor anyone who disagrees with me. I am all for constructive conversation.

I do have my comments set that any new commenter has to be cleared by me, and I get notified of every comment. So, just a tip to anyone who wants to post comments calling Med Students for Choice “fucking liars”, that killing an abortion provider is somehow defensible as a “choice” with equal footing as termination of early pregnancy or anything else along those lines, it’s not going to get through. I will use such comments as proof that so called anti-choice activists are unreasonable fringe elements that defend murderers, however, and are not pro-life. So, thanks for the fodder.

I also don’t allow anonymous posting, so I will have your email address. Not that I would want to communicate with someone with that point of view on purpose, I’m just saying, spewing hate with a trail is kind of….stupid. Especially if it’s a work address or you are affiliated with a university.

If you are of the anti-choice persuasion and for some reason enjoy reading my blog, however, please feel free to check out my blog for choice day post from this January and see if you are believing any of these myths and letting them guide your comment attempts.

I have wanted to do a post on common ground for a while, and I may have time to do it soon. I am totally cool with people wanting to support women with unplanned pregnancies and who want to help them keep their pregnancies and raise happy, healthy children. Hell, I carried two unplanned pregnancies to term. Obviously I support that option. However, hateful rhetoric is not welcome here. Exercise your freedom of speech on another site where such filth is welcome. Thanks!

6 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

I write letters, activist style

A double hat tip to Shakesville, one tip for the title and another for the story.

CNN has a headline referring to Scott Roeder, the confessed assassin of Dr. Tiller, as an “anti-abortion activist.”

Here is my letter:

I was shocked to see Dr. Tiller’s assassin referred to as an “abortion activist” by your website (http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/07/28/kansas.doctor.killed/index.html ) in a headline.

I am an abortion activist as a member of Medical Students for Choice. This man was many things: an assassin, a murderer, a terrorist, or simply “accused murderer” would have been accurate. He was not an activist.

Many people have complained that the popular media has normalized violent targeting of reproductive health care workers, and have theorized that this euphemization may embolden such “activists”. Please keep this in mind when covering this issue.

Signed,

A future provider of a legal, safe, necessary, common medical procedure who is sick of being maligned while violent nuts on the fringe’s feelings are coddled by the “most trusted name in journalism”.

Here is CNN’s Feedback form if you are so inclined.

2 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

Reply turned post, fair fight style

I was inspired by Shakesville’s Quote of the Day yesterday, (sorry, been busy!) which was the always inspiring (laughter / horror / disgust ) Michelle Bachman complaining that the public option “would offer equal or better benefits than any plan—but cheaper.”

I was listening to NPR this morning, and they had an interview with one of the representatives from Tennessee who identifies as a “blue dog” democrat. He is in some group that is trying to work out a “bipartisan” bill with 2 other blue dogs and 3 republicans. According to the NY Times today, a similar group in the senate is most likely coming out with what will be the successful Senate version of the bill.

So, what we have, is bills written by groups shutting out the liberal democrats that were elected en masse to reflect the public’s will. 70 to 80% of the public want a public option. So….

…this Tennessee representative today said he is one of the few in the group who actually was OK with the public option (way to represent- snort) as long as it operated on a level playing field.

I’m sorry, sir, does this mean the public option has to be expensive, bureaucratic, confusing, and deliver few benefits with poor service? Is he agreeing with Michelle Bachman that a public plan that covers people and isn’t prohibitively expensive was somehow unfair or undesirable?

So, if it works, it’s bad. And if it doesn’t work, it’s good?

1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

The Belmont Report

I am reading the Belmont Report in order to work with human research subjects. I am an ethics and research dork, and I love this kind of stuff.

Autonomy, beneficence and justice are pretty noble concepts, ones I would like to see more of in obstetrical practice. Although the Belmont Report draws a distinction between practice and research, it holds clinical practice to a higher standard for beneficence (the obligation to do no harm, pretty much).

I was struck by this part about justice:

There are several widely accepted formulations of just ways to distribute burdens and benefits. Each formulation mentions some relevant property on the basis of which burdens and benefits should be distributed. These formulations are (1) to each person an equal share, (2) to each person according to individual need, (3) to each person according to individual effort, (4) to each person according to societal contribution, and (5) to each person according to merit.

I was just thinking about this the other day. I remember reading “From each according to one’s ability, to each according to one’s need,” I think it was in some Green party literature a while ago. I was brooding over politics and conservatives, and thought that this was probably not a statement to which they would generally agree.

I am definitely a #2. If I had to rank them, I would go 2, 1, 3 = 4, 5. What is “merit”, anyway? A badge? How about y’all?

6 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

When the boat rocks, go with the flow

For those of you who don’t follow my life like a soap opera, let me explain. No, that would take too long. Let me sum up. (A race to see who names that butchered movie quote first).

I just got a predoctoral research fellowship at my medical school. I am taking a year off to do research, both my own research project and helping my mentors with their work. I had anticipated doing a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of doulas (trained labor attendants) in a population of women on Medicaid, which would be largely African American and Hispanic urban women. These women have dramatically worse birth outcomes than the rest of the population. My hope was to, eventually, encourage Medicaid to cover the cost of a doula.

Well, that plan had several obstacles. It would be very difficult to apply for funding, get awarded, conduct, analyze, write and submit an RCT of that magnitude in a year. Based on calculations, to have adequate power to claim any sort of confidence, I would need an intervention group of about 45. Paying for doulas and scheduling that many births would be a stupendous and annoying task.

To top it all off, there is already a great body of research supporting doulas. In fact, there is a 2007 Cochrane Review that concludes “All women should have support throughout labour and birth” based on the available research, and a United States Preventative Services Task Force evidence based review of labor and delivery in 2008 that gives continuous support by a doula a rating of “A”, which means “the USPSTF strongly recommends that clinicians provide [the service] to eligible patients. The USPSTF found good evidence that [the
service] improves important health outcomes and concludes that benefits substantially outweigh harms.” Only one other birth intervention got a rating of A, upright position in the pushing stage. Neither of those practices are standard of care.

However, some practices with weaker support of even recommendations against their use, such as denying food and water to laboring women and episiotomy, respectively, are routine and common during birth in the United States.

So, my wonderful mentors, who I am loving more and more every day, said that it sound to me like I would be working hard to contribute data that was already abundant. What I want to know is why there is a disconnect between evidence based clinical research and practice. Also, it seems that the same practices that are proven in literature but ignored in practice are the woman centered, autonomy encouraging practices, and the practices that disfigure and deprive women are the ones that persevere.

So, now I am going to do a study on attitudes on and barriers to incorporating certain practices into clinical obstetrics. I think I am going to compare those four practices: episiotomy, denial of food and water, continuous labor support by a doula, and upright positions in second stage. I want to examine perceptions of their evidence, confidence in the support of their effect on outcomes, and general attitudes toward each of the practices and evidence based medicine in general. I am going to write a questionnaire andsend it out to ob/gyns, probably ones in Florida, but we’ll see.

Cool? I think so.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

31 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

What the HELL???

Photobucket

I was blessed with being selected for the high-larious series on Shakesville,What the hell??, in which people send in embarrassing pictures from their youth. I sent in this art school self portrait.

Seriously, what the hell?

Check out the whole series. It’s a great stress release.

8 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

Good-bye, Cort

fritz-gatoI found out that one of my neighbors from college died, apparently from a drug-induced overdose of some kind. It was self-inflicted and maybe intentional.
ETA: Well, I heard wrong. I have heard since he shot himself, quite intentionally.

Cortland was my neighbor and my friend. He was a drinker, which was pretty standard for my college friends. He was an artist, too, which was also pretty standard. Well, I was in the art program.

He was fun and sarcastic and cynical. He had a unique, emphatic way of speaking. He would come over almost every night and drink his first quart of beer (Florida had some strange beer import laws at the time. We didn’t have 40’s. We had quarts. Which were synonymous with his nickname.) He would never finish his second quart, which he would inevitably kick over at some point, along with anything else his combat boots could catch. We kept a “shit towel” specifically for Cort to clean up his almost nightly spills.

Our friends all got lousy tattoos together in his apartment, which was a mirror image of ours, from a wandering hippie tattooing friend of his. He got R. Crumb’s Fritz the Cat on his leg. I found the exact picture he used for the tattoo, strangely enough on the cover of a Spanish printing of it but whatever. That was on the side of his lower leg. He used to call me “a bowl and a half kind of a girl,” which was a private joke.

He was always a tortured, sensitive artist type. I always suspected he would have trouble adapting to being a responsible grown up in society. I never knew him to do any hard drugs, one that would lead to a lonely overdose, but more than 15 years have passed since I sat across my living room from him.

His passing reminds me of Don McLean’s Vincent.

Good-bye Cort. This world was never meant for one as beautiful as you. Love, the bowl and a half kind of a girl

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized