Why am I not surprised?

Why am I not surprised that when there was shenanigans involving prescription companies hiring paid ghost writers to write journal articles, it was articles about women’s health?

The article in question was about hormone therapy (formerly called hormone replacement therapy). It was published as an “Editor’s Choice” article in the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. It contradicted a major study linking combination hormone therapy to an increased risk in breast cancer. This article said there was no evidence to support this, and suggested that women on hormone therapy actually survive cancer better.

I have been to three ob/gyn conventions, and at all three there was a featured speaker whose main point was to contradict the findings of the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) (which found a link between hormone therapy and heart disease) and/or the link between hormones and cancer.

I did a quick search on the Google, and the same physician who let his name appear on this supposedly ghost written article is also listed on the Cochrane Review of phytoestrogens for vasomotor sympyoms of menopause. You know, the natural alternative to hormone therapy that many women switched to after the WHI came out. Again, why am I not surprised that the review concluded that there was no significant benefit?

1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

One response to “Why am I not surprised?

  1. jendajen

    Gawd, I hate this practice.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s